@deercreekvols I don’t think SA needs to apologise. The story was a widely anticipated “hot news” on a semi-official account and was correct when it was written, i.e. there was already a post on the SEC’s Twitter account. The story was also making headlines elsewhere, such as on Bloomberg Radio. FYI, I sent a letter to the SA editor as soon as I heard the SEC’s retraction. SA corrected the story within minutes after the SEC denied responsibility for the false Twitter post. I’m usually the first to criticize SA for its mistakes, but IMHO that’s not the case here. Just my opinion.